Frantic Assembly
Research
Portfolio
English graduate students, now turned modern
contemporary practitioners Scott Graham and Steven Hoggett, created in 1994
their very own theatre company and with it a new style of modern contemporary
physical theatre.
Having created this theatre company with a
shared goal “to do something different”, the practitioners looked for
inspiration to create their own style.
When it came to presenting physical theatre performance styles the two
key inspirations that they grew accustomed to were theatre companies ‘DV8’ and
‘The Volcano Theatre Company’. These two
theatre company’s do share something particular in their physical theatre
style, as they do have a tendency to keeping their actors performance seem more
naturalistic. This is an element that
comes strongly into ‘Frantic Assembly’s’ modern contemporary style.
As a producing house company, ‘Frantic
Assembly’ has given many different structures to all of their productions. Their structures can be separated as dark and
gloomy, and light and fast-paced performances and production atmospheres. But there are two main elements that link all
their productions together is their actors/performers and their characters.
A feature that is often admired about the
company’s development and workshops is the shared devising methods. Having appointed themselves as Artistic
Directors, Scott Graham and Steven Hoggett like to have the input of their
fellow cast members, rather than having them create/devise the entire production. It does show within their productions as the
actors/performers have a strong element of giving/presenting their characters
through their naturalistic movement, yet it gives a visually un-naturalistic
look in the audience’s perspective. This
is something that many believe has been devised by both the actors and the
artistic directors. Through their
physical practice games/exercises it helps to build the actors physical and
mental trust between the each other.
Plus it really helps to visually break down the characters and their
features on stage. This helps their
audiences to understand the characters relationships, their current state of
mood and their mental desires. Plus
through largely choreographed movement segments, featured in every production
produced by ‘Frantic Assembly’, it really engages the audience into the
development of the plots and characters (shown particularly in their successful
productions ‘Lovesong’ and ‘Stcokholm’), and it reflects the ground breaking
and eye widening majesty of the ever growing physical theatre.
But what else does ‘Frantic Assembly’
offer as a contemporary physical theatre practitioner? Linking to their practices in having movement
segments, seeming larger than life, their stage structures take on a vast scale
to really back-up the “ah” factor in the audiences reactions/responses. Plus it also embraces the audience in a way
that makes them want to know more about the productions storylines and
characters. This is particularly shown
in their successful productions ‘Lovesong’ and ‘Stockholm’.
‘Lovesong’ depicts the story of a married
couple, but has two pairs in an ensemble cast to show the same married couple
in their youth and in their elderly age.
What makes this production so effective though is it presentation of the
characters. Instantly the audience knows
both pairs in the ensemble are playing the same characters, but when both pair
shares the stage during the production, they use it to an effect that shows the
elderly interpretation of the characters wish to be in their youth age
again. Plus with movement segment
involving opposite sides of the ensemble cast it really break down the
possibilities of endless desires and how strong hopes and wishes can damage an
individual’s well-being. Also there are
many little hints and elements within their stage structures that show the
inevitability of aging and loss, shown through the stage being riddled with autumn
leaves on the ground drying out. Along
with lighting effects to embrace the audience a step further into what
could/should/will happen in the upcoming events of this amazing story.
But it is in their other successful
production, ‘Stockholm’, that audiences are shown a completely different
interpretation of a married couple. Keeping
to single pair ensemble for its cast, ‘Stockholm’ shows a married couple only
in their youth and their many struggles in near everyday circumstances. Stage structure wise it has a more modern,
clean and organised vibe to its setting, reflecting modern society and the
couple’s age range. Not only that but
through the actors changed physicalized performances we saw a more adrenaline
emphasised couple that were always hell-bent on a singular objective (whether
making love or cooking dinner, it changes throughout the storyline) and that
enhances a sense of tension. This is why
‘Stockholm’ has more dark and gloomy lightings and stage facilities, reflecting
the upcoming tension and physical strikes towards each character, and that it
what also makes the production all the more intriguing for the audience,
wondering why the characters are like this and where are they going.
But in conclusion ‘Frantic Assembly’ has a
particularly strong series of styles.
Listing from naturalistic performances, large scale stage sets, and
elementary foreshadows within sets and character’s actions. But all in all they do keep a strong sense of
integument for their audiences, and offer new theatre lovers to embrace a style
that is modernised and naturalised to be recognised and popularised in the
future.
Through personal experience, I prefer the
acting method of keeping naturalistic movement and vocalisation. Therefore this contemporary style appealed to
me, especially when it came to have exaggerated movement within their
performances to give more meaning to the character’s actions and to furthering
the plot. During our college assignment
production of ‘Mike Bartlett’s’ ‘13’, we decided to have a naturalistic style
to our performances. This is something I
enjoyed working with, but wished we could take it further. So when watch ‘Frantic Assembly’s’
productions, such as ‘Lovesong’ I really admired their physical actions, and
how meaningful they were even at first glance.
Therefore I wish to take the opportunities, in future, to work in
devising productions and develop the production through detailed and meaningful
movements and storytelling.
But, all in all, what impact has it had to
modern contemporary theatre? ‘Frantic
Assembly’ has built something new and unique from something traditional and
classical. Through their performance
styles they offer integument towards their characters emotions, but through
naturalistic presentation, this is something that can be found in historical
contemporary theatre, such as ‘Commedia dell’Arte’. ‘Commedia’ offers a range of ‘Stock Characters’
that bring forth a unique physical being and that enhances the actor
presentation of those particular characters emotions. But it is ‘Frantic Assembly’ who has
replicated these kinds of styles, just by adding their own tweet to make it
relevant and popular amongst younger modern audience members, and I believe
they have succeeded.
Frank, You have included some really interesting research here, your blog provides a clear and consice background to each physical theatre style. You have discussed working methods and characteristics and shown a good understanding of the origins and intentions of each form of physical theatre. You have discussed influences and made some links between practitioners. Kirsty
ReplyDelete