Refinement
Monday 26th,
Wednesday 28th and Thursday 29th January 2015
Continuing where we left off
Having made
the conclusive plan to give an interview structure to our devising project, we
continued to work towards the physical aspects/montages we ought to put within
our main performance. We also looked at
how we could keep our character’s stories effective from the audience’s
perspective, in order to make our performance a success.
So to begin
with we refined our previous achievements.
We showed to the rest of our tutor group, and to our teacher, what we
created with our mysterious interview prologue/flash-forward and future scenes
concerning key characters. Keeping the mystery
of our characters strong, to begin with, then expanding on certain character
traits and origins (particularly within the love triangle and the affair
couple) the response was mostly positive.
·
Good physical gestures to show character’s
relationships.
·
Good use of music to support the character’s
movement pieces.
·
and Good reference towards ‘Frantic Assembly’
and ‘DV8’ physical theatre performance styles.
Although there
was one negative points given, that was worth taking in:
·
It was
hard for them to establish what our character’s relationships were; this is
something we hope to develop and expand upon, in future refining session, only
then can reach the correct time run of the performance piece and give our upcoming
audience the correct and detailed information about our performances storyline
and characters.
How did we develop what we had already
achieved?
Looking
particularly at me and my partner’s performance piece (performing as the Affair
couple) we wanted to really express the broken love between our characters. So sticking closely to improvised physical
actions, we wanted to keep certain character traits alive such as:
·
The woman wanting to end the relationship.
·
The man having enough troubles already and
currently in a bad mood. (Through
constructive criticism I changed my characters persona for this scene to have more
anger in his actions, rather than previously having a more awkward and fearful trait
to my performance. That way it give the
audience more understanding of what my characters is going though.)
·
The man wants to keep the relationship going.
·
and The woman despises his adultery actions.
While at first
we did struggle to construct a movement segment showing, or even just hinting
at, all these elements, we then turned to research for some inspiration. We looked particularly at contemporary
physical theatre performance’s that showed any hints or elements of friendship,
hatred and anger. The best video we
found was of this performance piece within ‘C2C’s’ music video of ‘Happy’:
I particularly
like the opening gestures towards his dance partner and I thought that could be
useful movement gesture to show the woman’s now hatred towards the man.
Another
element we felt the need to add to our performance was music, so together we browsed
many emotional and dark songs that we felt best depicted the relationship of
these characters. The best piece of
music that we both agreed on was ‘Ella Henderson’s’ ‘Say Something’:
Together we
agreed that this song was the best in summarising the message that the woman is
trying to get across to the man.
So we tried to
add these inspirations/elements to what we had already devised for this
movement scene, but quite frankly we weren’t getting anywhere with the
performance space and what we achieved.
It wasn’t as detailed as we wished, and we got quite lost in the
physical theatre elements. Therefore
with a little support we managed to start devising the affair couple’s movement
segment for scratch.
There was a
physical theatre practice trust exercise, we used in our early stages of
devising, and we were told that this could help us to expand on the affair
couples relationship. The exercise consisted
of a pair walking in a straight line, yet keeping in contact with one another, that
way it could show support and friendship.
But we agreed that we could use the exercise, but we thought we could
use the exercise to tell a different story.
Removing the
strategy of having both members of the pair supporting each other as they got
from one side of the room to the other, we wanted to show the female character
trying to escape, except the male character is blocking her path and he wants
her to stay and the relationship to continue.
Here is a
video clip showing what we had achieved using this exercise and what impact it
had physically to the audiences perspective:
I personally was really pleased with what
we achieved in this little performance.
I felt we showed the character’s objectives and what state they are
currently in. But when we gained feedback
there was some good point’s worth taking in:
·
There
were too many holding hand actions.
·
and
The time span was too short.
I personally could have argued that the
second point was wrong, because we had longer and equally effective movement
segments showing the love-triangle that took up most of the performances time
span, so our piece could have stayed as being short and effective. But then again we, as a devising group,
needed to extend the time span of the whole performance, so we took these
points into account and begun to make the changes and expand upon them in
future sessions.
How would we conclude the entire performance?
Beginning in a group discussion we agreed
that it would be good to include six interview questions, police officers would
ask to crime suspects. Having already
created three questions to open the performance we wanted to write three more
that we could use to conclude the entire performance. The three questions we all agreed on were:
1)
“Do
you know Doctor Joe?”
2)
“Did
he show any signs of depression?”
3)
and
“Do you feel responsible?”
I loved these questions because we referred
to them through our previous interview exercises. Plus this give a stronger link to the
stimulus, as we established that making my character the therapist, and the
victim of the suicide, my character was essentially ‘Billy Joe’, so making my
character’s name “Doctor Joe” gave a little reference, that will hopefully blow
audiences minds when revealed what our stimulus was.
Not only that but all these questions were
designed to miss lead our audience. The
first three were meant to intrigue our audience and make them wonder why these
characters are here and what has happened to bring them here. But the final questions miss lead them in the
way that the audience knows my character has died, but are wondering if any of
the supporting characters did it. That
way we could create two final ensemble pieces showing physical gestures that
the supporting characters are innocent and my character committed suicide.
But how could we stage this? Well I suggested this performance structure
from start to finish:
Scene 01: The flash-forward (the interview prologue).
Scene 02: The love-triangle (the first therapy
session and physical segment of the love triangle character’s relationship).
Scene 03: The affair couple (the movement
segment showing the couple’s troubles).
Scene 04: The love-triangle part two.
Scene 05: The second interview.
Scene 06: Doctor Joe’s suicide.
Plus I and my partner worked on a plan to
how we could stage “Doctor Joe’s suicide”.
Once again I was really pleased with what we created, because “Doctor
Joe’s death” was now the strongest reference point to the stimulus, as he
commits suicide by jumping off “the Tallahatchie Bridge”. Plus rather than keeping it to a one man
performance piece, we managed to make it an ensemble piece, and this is was we achieved
as a mental plan for future sessions:
Having a large block centre stage
simulated the bridge and with physical movements of showing pain, confusion and
depression I feel I can show to the audience “Doctor Joe’s” current state of
mood and what he plans to do to rectify his situations. Plus with our plans to include blackouts and mimicking
followers to make it an ensemble piece, I feel we can succeed in concluding our
performance in high, positive and dramatic note, leaving our audience wanting
more.
I felt that the conclusion of this week
was amazing; as we gained new and better elements which I strongly hope to
expand on and develop in future sessions in order to make our devising
performance the best performance we would have given.
No comments:
Post a Comment