Monday, 5 October 2015

Classical Theatre Research Blog 2 - Shakespeare

Classical Theatre Research – Performances
     Through my research I have discovered many fascinating contextual facts concerning William Shakespeare’s classical stage layout, actor’s performances, and contemporary comparison.  In this research blog I will share all my research and understanding of William Shakespeare’s impact, socially, culturally, and politically, on classic and modern theatre.  

Performances
     William Shakespeare’s key trademark is of course his written language.  On paper many, today, consider the text too confusing and out of date, and even for many actor the reading text is difficult to process.  Which is why it’s down to all Shakespearean actor to perform in such a way that makes the text entertaining and all the more understandable.  In many cases this hasn’t been to many modern actor’s likings.  But when handled professionally, todays actors can project such acceptional performances that homage to the classical performances of the Elizabethan era.  But back in the Elizabethan era, what did performers do that was different to todays standards of acting?

·         Movement – Travelling back in time to the Elizabethan era, audiences to Shakespeare’s plays were to a some-what dance-like performance.  With ‘the Globe Theatre’s’ open air and circular structure all the performers had to really emphasis their moements.  In particular, gestures to other characters.  Slow hand gstures implied a sense of grace and love between the characters.  But sudden and sharp hand gestures implied a rivalry and hatred between the characters.  The movements had to be spot on, precise and meaningful because if the audience couldn’t hear the dialogue they would understand the characters relationships and progression of the story.  It is a well known fact that female characters back then were played by male actors, therefore their movements had to be elegant and femenistic, not to a realistic degree, but to a standard that made the audience see the woman not the actor.

·         and Speech Variations – Today Shakespearean text is analysed and interpret in many different fashions by many different people.  But it is these vocal techniques that, may have been produced/plotted by Shakespeare himself, and are definitely used by today’s professional actors.  These techniques are:
-           Iambic Pentameter
-          Alliteration
-          Single Syllables
     These techniques in particular emphasis certain words and sentences with Shakespeares most famous monologues and soliloquies, and gives the spoken variation a much more accurate and realistic structure and interpretation. 
     It is iambic pentameter that gives it a five heartbeat structure, emphasising certain words and giving the text a song pacing structure that would intrigue the audience all the more.  Here is an example of iambic pentameter in work: “To be, or not to be: that is the question…” every highlighted word would be enhanced in spoken variations, giving it a pattern of “up and down, up and down”.  This technique wouldn’t last for just one sentence it would be continuous throughout the soliloquy, giving an extremely intirguing performance and an entertaining new basis to the character.
     Alliteration is witten text technique that many have come across before.  How can you find alliteration in text?  Alliteration is when more that one word in the sentence has the same first letter, for example; “A bird of my tongue is better than a beast of yours.” – Beatrice, ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ Act 1 Scene 1.  In today’s standards alliteration is often ignored, but in spoken Shakespearean language actors could really embrace the sound of the word, in this case “bee”.  Now depending on the purpose of the scene actors could add a sense of aggression or passion, depending on why the character is saying this line in particular.
     Now single syllables has a true purpose for the actors.  Single syllables has the performer slow the pacing of their lines to a level that adds depth to what their characters’ are saying.  Shakespeare used this technique to ensure his audience was truly intrigued by the characters and the progression of his stories.   

Social Impact
     Inside the theatre’s/playhouses actors gave their performances and they were well received by all audiences.  However outside the theatre’s the actors, were not well perceived. 
     Often referred to as ‘rogues’ and ‘vagabonds’, actors had to carry papers, or credentials, to be accepted into certain places and counties.  This had a somewhat concerning affect onto Shakespeare himself.  All Elizabethan plays, at the time, had to go through a series of reviews to ensure cencorship, making the plays and the performances politically and religiously appropriate.
     Alternativeley an Elizabethan actor’s lifestyle, if they did their jobs well, could be no different from famous actors today.  As the decades passed in Elizabethan times, theatres/playhouses became increasingly popular, therefore the amount of plays produced Shakespeare lead to some incredible performances that were praised.  Popular Elizabethan/Shakespearean actors list from:

·         Edward Alleyn
·         Richard Burdage
·         Robert Armin
·         Henry Condell
·         Christopher Beeston
·         Nathan Field
·         even William Shakespeare partook acting role before becoming a playwright.
·         and many more.

     Many of these actors became successful, popular and wealthy men, and were the Elizabethan celebrities.  But what mad them such a success?

·         Performing in Theatres – ‘The Globe Theatre’ was constructed, similarly to famous Roman arenas and collaciams, with a circular formation, open air presentation, and had to rely heavily on its performers.  In today’s standards ‘the Globe Theatre’ often has support via microphones, atmospheric lighting, and smoke machines.  However dating back to the Elizabethan era, ‘the Globe’ had artistic stage designs to create the atmosphere and natural lighting so the audience could see.  But it was the actors who made the show real.  It was these actors who were trained to project their full capacity and make Shakespeare’s text entertaining and realistic.  Unlike a playhouse, audience memebers couldn’t always hear the actors, or even understand what was going on in the scene.  But through their physical and vocal training audiences could understand, what was happening in the scene, what the characters relationships were, and how the play was progressing.  All was actives through pure and acceptional physicality and powerful vocal delivery.


·         Performing in Playhouses – Rival playhouses, to ‘Shakespeare’s Globe’, provided actors with a much more simple basis, by building a stage with a pub/inn.  The results were some entertaining performances, but tested the actors more on their vocal delivery and memorisation of text.  This brought about a success for playhouse landlord/ladies and a starting career point for all actors who began in playhouses.  

 

·         and Performing in Female Roles – As mentioned earlier, all female roles in Elizabethan times were performed by men, to be more accurate young men.  Young actors, with no facial hair, a lower tone in voice, and a talent for slow and fragile physical movements were perfect for the role.  It was also cotumes and make-up that completed the image of these young men being women on stage.  They were classically and professionally trained to give certain physcial gestures to ensure all audience memebers from the distance wouldn’t mistaken them for men.  The performance style of men playing women is capture exceptionally in the motion picture ‘Stage Beauty’ (motion picture trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkxo0oqGMwU) which captures the popularity of performing as a women, yet also hgihlights the negatives of such a role.  The movements could have be reffered to as “over-the-top” or “meaningless”.  Plus the actors make-up was often poisenous and caused unhealthy results for these young men.  But all in all it is a legacy that can be admired or dreaded.  It wasn’t until the rein of King Charles II that the law was lifted and women could act on stage.

Cultural and Political Impact
     Culturally Shakespearean performers have left a legacy that has brought a Shakespearean school (the Royal Shakespeare Academy) and with Shakespeare’s many plays future generations have offered thousands of interpretations of.  Not only that but performance styles and movements, particularly men playing womens roles, have developed many educations into the wider range of the performing arts.  Shakesprean styles also has a interrelation with Pantomime and Commedia Dell’Arte with their movement styles to bring characters to life and entertaining factors.
     Politically wise, Shakespeare wasn’t always free to write what he pleased, he was under the censorship to have near all his political characters to be powerful, arrogant and often correct.  But this is anpother legacy that has experiements actors abilities to physcially and vocally project an stand out character that’s offers more to the plays and shows a wider range to the world that all can enjoy and be entertained by.

Key research link:
Iambic Pentameter –

Alliteration –

Shakespearean Language -

Social Impact –

No comments:

Post a Comment