Saturday 15 March 2014

Week Twenty-Three Part 3: Human Zoo (Physical Theatre)

The Human Zoo

Developing Physical Theatre Performance
     Throughout the course of this term our physical theatre lessons have been leading up to developing our understanding of our individual physical movement.  Each member of the tutor group has their unique way of body language, and the main point of this assignment was to look at our own physical movement and see how we can relate to the movement of animals.
     At the beginning of this assignment we were given a task to create our own animal.  The purpose of this task was to show our understanding of how many different species of animals have their way of movement.  We had to create the animal, present its key features, inform the group about its habitat and if it was a predator or if it was a prey of another species.  In creating our own animal we were to show our understanding of how to present an animal’s movement, as well as mixing a combination of animal features which was to be performed to the group.  The animal I created, fictionally lived in South American, it key characteristics were having sharp teeth, with long Ant-Eater like arms, with claws, and frog like legs so it may spring into action to catch its prey.  After inventing the characteristics of the animal, I then had to present its movement.  My idea of its movement was for it to keep low as if it were constantly stalking its prey, its claw were to be scratching the floor, in the way of showing off his main weapons.  To conclude I presented its spring into action using its legs to propel above its prey and impale it with its long sharp claws, then it would rest and eat away.
     I felt this lesson was a good introduction to the assignment, as not only did we present our originality in creating a made up animal based around real living creatures, but we were also able to show our understanding of animal movements.  In doing so we made our first step in embodying another species that was completely different to our own.
 
     In the following Physical Theatre lessons we began to look at our own physical movement, and studied each step as to how we could relate it to a real animal.  The animals had to be a land based animal and something you would find in the zoo.  Our teacher carefully analysed each of our movement then resulted in see what we would look like in presenting that certain animal, then make the decision.  Judging by my own movement, it seemed to be quite speedy yet can be at a slow pace at certain times.  My teacher then made the decision to see if I could present the physicality of a dog.  The breed of dog I chose, in particular, was a Jack-Russell, the reason being I understood their physicality being that they can be slow at some times, but the majority being that they can be very fast.
     The following lessons were for us to present the movement of our chosen animal and begin research into how we could develop the characterisation.  But as the lessons went on it became clear that my chosen animal wasn’t the species that can be found in the zoo, therefore my teacher changed my animal to a wolf.  The wolf’s characterisation is very different to a house dog, as the wolf’s keen instinct is to protect their territory and hunt for food.  Also a wolf’s physicality is being tall and proud, in the sense they are the alpha wolf (a tough leader of a group).
     This became more of a challenge to present the characterisation of a wolf, so we then came to the final decision to keep the wild style of an animal and stick to the canine species.  The decision was then made for my animal to be a fox.
 
     When being assigned the task to present a fox’s characterisation, I did some research as to how different their movement is compared to an average house dog.  The research I looked at was some found footage of a fox trespassing in someone’s back garden.  Now what was interesting about this type of canine’s characterisation was its slight relation towards a wolf’s.  Foxes have a strong protection over their territory, which relates to the wolf, except a wolf takes pride in keeping their land, whereas a fox likes to make their area as big as possible.  In doing so their body language is kept at a low, in the same way a land predator stalks their prey.  Another key factor, to studying the fox’s movement, is I discovered that foxes have a strong ability of speed.  From the footage I watched the fox was marking its territory by teasing a dog to leave its area, teasing by demonstrating its ability to run twice the speed of the dog.  But when the fox unleashed its yell of anger, it was almost screaming to the dog “stay away”.  So watching found footage of a fox, I discovered its speedy pacing, when showing off to opposing garden animals, as well as its low physicality in the of it not taking as much pride in its territory, but wanting to keep the area wide and to itself.
     When observing this animal my key instinct was looking for obvious movement that stood out compared to the foxes slow pacing which was very similar to dogs.  Watching the whole footage I was able to understand why the fox was moving at the exact speed and why is could have been slightly hesitant.  But another key point in the foxes physicality that I needed to understand was what the vocal cords of the fox sounded like.  At first it sounded as if the fox had the vocal cords of a human and was simply yelling at foes.  But from watch other footages repeatedly I was able to analyse the footage to know that it was a combination of barking and howling.  Again used to mark its territory and present its strength and anger.
 
     What I had to do to achieve this performance was simply to watch the videos repeatedly and fully understand why the fox would move in at the certain speed.   I managed to understand that the key features in a fox’s performance were the concepts of fear of the unknown and protection over what could be theirs.  So during rehearsals we came up with a stage that was to have wide walking area so people may observe our animals, and there were to be small stages that were to represent our animal’s cages.  The movement I decided to present was, to begin with, to present the foxes pacing, in its cage, and also show how alert the fox constantly is.  Without giving any of the vocal presentation.  Then our teacher introduced the idea of having each member of the group present their animals eating habits.  Next the animals were to move outside their cages and walk amongst the other animals, in order to present more of the animal’s physicality.  So during the movement segment, I decided to present more of the fox pacing, then its concern and fear by jumping into a speedy run away from what it thinks is an enemy.  This would then lead to an opportunity to present the fox marking its territory as well as presenting the foxes vocal cords.  To conclude the show, our teacher suggested, that we were to take our performances of our animals and turn into our humans.  The purpose of this was to show the relationship between both physical movements.  Thus showing our own movement is relatable towards the animals movements, this would help the audience to understand why we were the chosen animals.
     The next step I took in researching the fox’s physicality was looking at some photographs and observing the facial expressions.  From the photos I found I discovered that the main facial expression of the fox reflected on their constant feeling of being alert.  This was shown through their wide eyes, locked on what surrounding area.  The second photo showed the fox in a position of stalking and having its eyes focused on an enemy.  This showed the face lowered to the ground with the eyes still as wide as possible fixed on their prey.  But the final photo showed how fierce the fox truly can be.  Presenting its vast anger against its enemies, this again, was presenting more of the fox showing off its skills and over protection of its territory.
     I thought these videos and photos were extremely helpful, because it assisted deeply for when it came for me embodying the fox.   It helped me to understand how and why it moved at a certain speed as well as knowing the facial expressions to give that extra bit of detail to ensure an accurate portrayal of the fox.
 

     When it came to achieving the physicality of the fox I looked into my own physical structure, in order to see if I could give the decent interpretation.  When rehearsing the stage movement, my first decision was begin on all four legs, then to learn and understand the standing structure of the fox.  From watching the found footage of the fox, within somebody's back garden, I analysed its physicality and I noticed that it was very alert of its surroundings and it physically stood its ground as if to say "this is my land".  So during rehearsals we create a scenario where the animals would interact with one another so I thought this would be a good opportunity to present the fox standings its ground as well as presenting it fears.  How I achieved the physicality, of the fox, was beginning by relaxing my body in preparation for the movement.  Whilst being on four legs I kept my back straight so I was able to keep a solid appearance, as well as presenting the fact that the fox wants to keep and stand his ground.  Another part of my physical presentation I thought was essential for embodying the fox was my neck muscles.  I decided to keep my neck muscles strong, by finding focus points in the room, keeping eye contact, and have both my neck and facial expressions solid.  In the sense of delivering the moral message that even though the fox, and the audience, know that this zoo isn't the fox’s territory, but likes to keep its distance from other animals.
     Another physicality I looked at was when the fox was literally moving on stage.  Again, from the found footage, I saw that it was slightly different to its alert standing structure.  Whilst pacing it took each step at an average speed, keeping its head low but eyes up, looking ahead.  I was able to achieve this when it came to the open half of the performance, as the animals were all in their cages and I wanted to present the fox confusion by pacing in its cage, the pausing once in a while to show how alert it is of the other animals, and is ready to strike if needed.  I think this was effective for my main performance because the audience would be able to understand what the fox has been through, in coming to this zoo, what emotions it is feeling at the exact moments of the performance, interatcing with the other animals, and ensure the audience get every detail of the fox’s physicality.

 
     Before rehearsals came underway we had two lessons of watching two movies which showed two stories of animal to human transformation.  The first movie was of a stage production called “Kafka’s Monkey” and the second movie was a documentary called “Project Nim”.
     “Kafka’s Monkey”, I thought was a great example of a humans portrayal of an animal (a monkey).  The story of the play was of one actor on stage, breaking the forth wall, in telling the audience the story of how she was originally a monkey and, over time, transformed into a human.  The script of the production went into so much detail of how painful it was for this character to travel from her home and become this creature she never knew existed.  Whilst the plot was interesting and intriguing, the main focus, for us, in the production was the actress’s physicality on stage.  The idea that she was once an animal and had become a human, meant that she would have to walk and talk like a human, only to show little hints to the audience that she still had a bit of the animal within her.  This was shown in both physically and verbally.  Verbally we could understand her, but there was that slight impression that this language was new to her and she was still learning.  Whereas physically, her body was, in some ways, split into two.  The bottom half of her body was almost normal, with the legs being in use for pacing; whereas the top half of the body had more relation to a monkey of all.  As one of her arms was fixed on her back in the way that a monkeys arm is and the other is to the ground.  But mainly there was a strong hint of the being human aspect as she communicated with the audience as a human, she used some of her physicality as a human; but there were times when, especially when she climbed a ladder, it was obvious that she was once a monkey.  But I thought this video of the production was very good, as the actress gave an incredible presentation of a human who was once a monkey physically.
    But when it came to the documentary of “Project Nim”, it was a different story entirely.  This documentary told the story of a group of scientists in the 1970s that began a project in which they took a monkey in captivity and taught it sign language so it would become a human.  I thought this was interesting, yet not as effective as the previous video.  “Project Nim” showed us the physicality of the monkey and how it slowly evolved and developed a hint of characteristics of a human.  This documentary showed us that monkey developed a personality of its own and it was interesting to see how, in many ways, it rebelled against learning the ways of a human.  The story of the scientist trying to change Nim’s way and see if they could increase Nim’s personality was interesting, but not as affective, in the way of showing us the physicality.  We saw what it was like for the monkey to be developing slowly but it wasn’t as detailed as “Kafka’s Monkey”, as we saw the point of view from the monkey who became human.  Whereas “Project Nim” showed us the point of view of the scientists, of who didn’t think this project through as it wasn’t a success.
     But I think these videos were very helpful towards my performance, because I knew that when it came to the physicality of the human, to show a few hints of the animal in the actions as well as to give a slow change into the human as to show the slow development of the animal.
 
     Throughout this assignment I found it very interesting to know the physical movements of the animals and how that can be reflected on your own physical movement.  What I found easy in the assignment was learning how to move and embody the fox.  But what I found difficult was understanding the reasons why the fox moved in a certain way and why it gave different forms of facial expression.
     However I managed to overcome these difficulties by spending more time watching the found footage videos of the foxes repeatedly.  Constantly watching these videos helped so I could analyse the foxes movement and facial expression to get more detail, and fully understand how to embody the fox.


No comments:

Post a Comment